CRMuse
CRMuse
customer relationship management
news and analysis
 Topics  
Home
CRMuse Articles (23/0)

 Ads  

 What's New  
STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

LINKS last 2 wks
No recent new links


 User Functions  
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

 Older Stories  
Monday 14-Mar
  • Government CRM, and the Birth of a Nation (errr... Website) (22)

  • Sunday 13-Mar
  • Five Questions With Jim Dickie (20)

  • Thursday 10-Mar
  • My Three Weeks in Telecom: A CRM Insider's Nightmare (22)

  • Wednesday 09-Mar
  • Incentives R Around, Pi R Squared (and Other Math Jokes) (24)

  • Tuesday 08-Mar
  • Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk (23)

  • Monday 07-Mar
  • Where Is the CRM Love Of My Life? (23)
  • Who Are You, and What Are You Doing Here? (22)


  •  Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk    
     Author:  jcompton
     Dated:  Tuesday, March 08 2005 @ 11:15 AM EST
    CRMuse ArticlesI hadn't planned to do an article today (after the grueling launch, the shareholders agreed that I could take the day off) but then the phone rang this morning. And then it rang again, and I knew I had just run into another one of those CRM Gone Wrong moments.

    My home line rang first. It was Julie from Advanced Vacations, or Jamie from Extravagant Vacations, or something like that. A recorded voice trying to sell me something I wasn't in the market for.

    I have a real problem with recorded cold calling because there is no acceptable opt-out capability. At least with a live person, I can try to cut them off and request that I be removed from their lists. But Jessie from Extreme Vacations would presumably only share that information after I'd listened to her digitized pitch. (To be fair, I do also find the recorded messages consumers can play at telemarketers spouting a boilerplate opt-out message to be a bit un-sporting, but I understand the appeal for some.)

    So, as I was hanging up on Jane (total time elapsed: about 5 seconds), my work line started ringing. And, wouldn't you know it, it's the same woman, with the same message! And the same lack of opt-out, never mind the same lack of motivation on my part to listen to the offer.

    My first response was to be amazed at just how fast those dialers must operate and how much volume they must push at once—my two lines are on the same exchange, but pretty much on the opposite ends of the 10,000 number span, and very little time had passed. Unless, of course, it works randomly and not sequentially and they just happened to want to pick on me.

    I appreciate that the telephone is a legitimate prospecting channel, and within certain rules of engagement, I don't mind being prospected in that manner. And automation is wonderful for routine notifications as part of an existing relationship. (Do I need the pharmacy tech to tell me a prescription is ready or has been delayed? Not especially, the recording does just fine.) But there's just so much that doesn't work about outbound cold calling that I'm surprised the practice survives.

    In a world so brimming with interactive choices to deal with customers, it is more deadly linear than even a pamphlet—at least with a pamphlet, I can skip to the end to find out what this holiday is and what it's going to cost me, or flip it over to find out who to contact about opting out. The format persists, of course, for the same reason I keep getting credit card convenience checks--the cost of making the pitch is so low, it's hard not to want to make it.

    Even though do-not-call regulations are inevitably going to be softened in the name of commerce, I find it difficult to believe that this sort of pitch is going to survive unregulated. No matter—or perhaps, thanks to—how many times they can ring the phones on my desk in 10 seconds or less.

    None of the companies mentioned in this article have been clients of CRMuse LLC or Jason Compton for at least the past six months. Actually, I don't remember the name of the travel agency, despite the fact that they called me twice. More fool they!




     What's Related  

     Story Options  
  • Mail Story to a Friend
  • Printable Story Format


  • Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk | 3 comments | Create New Account
    This site claims no responsibility for posted comments. And we will turn them off if they become a big problem.
    Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk
    Authored by: tetris05 on Tuesday, March 08 2005 @ 11:39 AM EST
    It stinks because when you try to hang up you can't. I'll hang up and try to make a call and I've got Janice from Elaborate Vacations still yapping.
    Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk
    Authored by: jcompton on Tuesday, March 08 2005 @ 11:45 AM EST
    That's an excellent point, one I hadn't considered. Since it takes the phone company longer to "honor" a hangup by the recipient, the net result is to have your line tied up for a while until the system recognizes what's happened. I can't say it's ever happened to me, and I have the luxury of two lines and so forth, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some "I couldn't reach 911 because Janelle from Exquisite Vacations was still yammering on!" story out there, somewhere.

    In any case, yes. Lack of opt-out, lack of an "instant" hang-up on the part of the recipient, makes this a dubious marketing strategy, in my view.
    Predictive Dialers, We Need To Talk
    Authored by: JGillespie on Tuesday, March 08 2005 @ 12:34 PM EST
    At the very least, however, the recordings are easily avoidable for those of us with less desire to get pitched at by a person (or at all, actually). Caller ID has, I imagine, put a big dent into the cold calling market, but I would actually prefer the few that sneak by as potential friends or family be recordings so I don't get pangs of guilt for hanging up on a real person. I have no spine, I know; but recordings are good for those of us like that!